Products, Vendors, CAD Files, Spec Sheets and More...
Sign up for LAWeekly newsletter
Landscape architects are uniquely positioned to provide guidance and strategic counsel during volatile planning projects. Building a new high school, for instance, which seems fairly straightforward, can be controversial. Proof of that is Franklin, Indiana. Located 22 miles south of Indianapolis, this growing suburb prides itself on being a small city with small town warmth and personality. But, when opinions differed regarding the proposed location of the new high school, the warm, friendly community exploded, and a volatile debate erupted.
The Franklin community strongly supported the need for a new high school. Some community members believed the board?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?s recommendation to build on an 83-acre east-side parcel owned by the school corporation would limit future expansion and athletic programs. The issue was further complicated when community school board elections changed the composition of the board members. When the new board identified a larger site southwest of town, arguments over the site?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?s suitability erupted.
The new board recognized the issue had become extremely emotional and that any site selection would be viewed as having political overtones. For site selection assistance, the board turned to InterDesign, the multidisciplinary firm based in Indianapolis that was designing the high school.
Design development documents for the new Franklin Community High School at the eastside site were basically complete when the new board was elected. The challenge was to find a new school site better suited than the original proposed site favored by the previous school board, and the new southwestern site favored by the new school board. The site would also have to accommodate the design development layout, as schedule and budget would not allow for building redesign to address the site specific requirements at a new site. To add credibility to site selection, a new high school master plan showing how any preferred site could be developed was also required.
InterDesign landscape architect Bill Moldenhauer recalls being skeptical and worried about finding a site that could satisfy everyone and accommodate the building for 2,000 students already designed for the initial location.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?There were only so many large sites in the community,?EUR??,,????'?????<? he explains. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?It was critical to help the board find a site superior to the east and southwestern sites supported by the existing and past boards. An intentional byproduct of our site selection was extensive public involvement, which could serve as a balm for the ailing community.?EUR??,,????'?????<? Moldenhauer and the team developed and guided the school board in establishing a schedule, creating site qualifying criteria, identifying potential properties, completing a full site analysis, and conceptual master planning for the selected site finalist.
Challenged to find an objective, impartial evaluation method, Mr. Moldenhauer and his team developed a data-driven approach with the hope that it would simplify the decision and mend the rift in the community.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?We established a long list of criteria for an ideal site,?EUR??,,????'?????<? he recalls. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?For example, we wanted to be sure that the size was large enough for all the current program elements and impending growth, that the stormwater management would be sufficient and the soils would not complicate construction.?EUR??,,????'?????<?
?EUR??,,????'?????<?Once base criteria were determined, we invited community members to propose a site with the understanding that every property would be evaluated,?EUR??,,????'?????<? explains Mr. Moldenhauer. Eventually the team studied 28 sites. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?The school corporation put no pressure on us for one site or another, but some were clearly too small or didn?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?t have appropriate vehicular circulation. The biggest issue was the potential access to sanitary a sewer.?EUR??,,????'?????<?
As the three-month site selection progressed, public meetings allowed interested parties to see how the sites were being reviewed.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?All of our meetings were open, so that anyone could come in and discuss the issues,?EUR??,,????'?????<? Moldenhauer notes.
One of the identified sites that seemed to satisfy the selection criteria stood out as an excellent possibility, unfortunately, the site fell from consideration because the owner had no interest in selling. However, there was a sizable chunk of land across the street, and that owner was willing to sell. The team added the site to the list, which eventually became one of three finalists.
Paring down the list of potential sites from 28 to three proved fairly easy. However, deciding on a final site to recommend required additional analysis, conceptual master planning and community consensus. A 17-step site analysis was undertaken to determine which of the most appropriate sites was superior site for the Franklin community.
Measured considerations and evaluations of the proposed properties were undertaken and studied, including multiple land appraisals, geotechnical assessments, utility examinations and state code evaluations. Even archaeological surveys were completed to ensure no antiquities existed on the properties. The result of the assessments culminated with a public presentation of the entire site analysis to solicit comments from community and taxpayers about the prospective sites.
Following additional public meetings at which geotechnical engineers compared the soil characteristics of each of the finalists, all of the stakeholders agreed on a site for the new high school.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?The city?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?s comprehensive plan also showed a major street upgrade for the road on the south side of the property, giving this property excellent vehicular access,?EUR??,,????'?????<? Moldenhauer says. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?We were able to angle the design development layout of the proposed high school from the original site to parallel an existing ridge, which provides a dramatic procession from the main entry drive and allowed us to use flatter areas for parking and sports fields,?EUR??,,????'?????<? he says. The 63 acres east of the school are suitable for future growth including a north-south connector street, possibly a fire station, as well as a potential administration building or elementary school.
The approved site trumped the eastern site by having contiguous buildable land versus being separated by multiple highways. It also exceeded both eastern and southwestern sites by providing more property for future building and sports field expansion. The geotechnical analysis also discovered the southwestern site required mediation for wet soil conditions.
The preferred site was selected by a criteria and data driven analysis versus local political pressure or school board influence. With the very public and detailed site analysis, divisiveness in the community over the school site ebbed and support grew for the identified, measurably superior site.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?Looking back, I think this is the best site we could have found,?EUR??,,????'?????<? reflects Moldenhauer. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?It also turned out to be a good choice for the community, which began by preferring two different sites, but eventually found a compromise that proved to be much better. It?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?s exciting to see a client and community make a decision based on good, sound data. At the final meeting, a lot of people came up to thank us for our role.?EUR??,,????'?????<?
The Franklin Community High School project is not unique in its troubles. Often landscape architects find themselves in the middle of community battles over project locations and environmental impact, security and safety issues. The landscape architects from InterDesign in Indianapolis who developed this criteria-based, community-engaged process served as mediators and facilitators. The outcome of their hands-on solution to this community problem was three-fold: a superior site for the community of Franklin, Indiana, a mended community and recognition from the Indiana Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects for a well-executed, innovative approach that serves as a model for future projects.
?EUR??,,????'?????<?As landscape architects, we?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?d always like to help qualify sites before the owners decide where to build,?EUR??,,????'?????<? Moldenhauer says. ?EUR??,,????'?????<?It?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?s nice to start by asking about the program and then finding the land that fits the vision. We?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?re happy we could do that here, and we?EUR??,,????'?????<???EUR?re even prouder that we were able to develop and manage a process that took an emotional conflict through data analysis to a solution that has begun to heal the rift.?EUR??,,????'?????<?
Francisco Uviña, University of New Mexico
Hardscape Oasis in Litchfield Park
Ash Nochian, Ph.D. Landscape Architect
November 12th, 2025
Sign up to receive Landscape Architect and Specifier News Magazine, LA Weekly and More...
Invalid Verification Code
Please enter the Verification Code below
You are now subcribed to LASN. You can also search and download CAD files and spec sheets from LADetails.