Products, Vendors, CAD Files, Spec Sheets and More...
Sign up for LAWeekly newsletter
Here?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'????s a good idea?EUR??,,????'?????<??????????????????????(R)???????+?Close a few streets and remove all the traffic lights and see if that speeds up travel in urban centers. That?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'????s what they found when city planners in Seoul tore down a six-lane highway, replaced it with a five-mile-long park and discovered that traffic flow didn?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'????t get worse?EUR??,,????'?????<????????????????????it got better.
There are several paradoxes at work here. The first is based on an economic theory put forth in the 1920s by mathematician Dietrich Braess of Ruhr University. It states that in a network where all the moving participants seek the most efficient route, adding extra capacity can reduce the efficiency. What happened in Seoul is Braess?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'???? paradox in reverse. By reducing the capacity of the network, i.e. removing a highway, they improved the flow of traffic. Although this is counterintuitive, it turns out that the idea behind this kind of design approach to traffic is based on manipulating the inherent self-interest of all the drivers.
Michael Gastner wrote an article called ?EUR??,,????'?????<?????????????????The Price of Anarchy in Transportation Networks,?EUR??,,????'?????<????????????????? published in September 2008 in Physical Review Letters. He discussed the Nash Equilibrium to which says that traffic patterns in real world networks eventually hit a stop point. Then no single driver can do any better by unilaterally changing strategies. Studies found that the only way to improve on the Nash Equilibrium is when drivers are forced to coordinate their own movements with everyone around them, and act unselfishly to benefit the entire group. When you close roads, selfish drivers have less choices and find it more difficult to pick the ?EUR??,,????'?????<?????????????????best?EUR??,,????'?????<????????????????? route. They therefore have to act unselfishly and as a result, the traffic flow improved.
There is another counterintuitive traffic strategy known as shared streets. Encouraging driver anarchy by removing traffic lights, street markings and boundaries between the street and the sidewalk, safety and traffic flow were improved. That?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'????s because without traffic regulation, drivers have to acct unselfishly and take more responsibility for their actions.
Recently this was tried in a downtown Montgomery, Alabama intersection, which was turned from a signalized one to a plaza shared by cars, bikes and pedestrians. More eye contact was the result of driver discomfort and nervousness, and resulted in the drivers going slower.
These strategies make the selfish needs of individual drivers less important than the collective good of everyone. This might be a good time, given the Obama administration?EUR??,,????'?????<???????????????????????(R)?EUR??,,????'????s investment in public infrastructure projects, to consider making a larger niche for bicycles and pedestrians?EUR??,,????'?????<????????????????????and thus improving traffic and congestion for everyone.
Francisco Uviña, University of New Mexico
Hardscape Oasis in Litchfield Park
Ash Nochian, Ph.D. Landscape Architect
November 12th, 2025
Sign up to receive Landscape Architect and Specifier News Magazine, LA Weekly and More...
Invalid Verification Code
Please enter the Verification Code below
You are now subcribed to LASN. You can also search and download CAD files and spec sheets from LADetails.