ADVERTISEMENT
LASN PMBR News March 200603-02-06 | News



Georgia Limits Mailbox Placement






In some places, these brick mailboxes are illegal no matter what. In some places, there has to be a minimum of four addresses sharing the box. In some places, it?EUR??,,????'???s anything goes?EUR??,,????'??+except for size, shape and distance from the road.


You’ve seen big brick mailboxes right next to the road. You may have one. But they’re illegal on some roads. An Albany driver plowed through two of them but she and her baby were not hurt. Those big mailboxes are actually outlawed on state roads. Georgia Department of Transportation code says, “a mailbox installed with a support structure of stone or masonry…is considered a Right of Way Encroachment.” Such encroachments are unlawful on “any public road.”

In Council Bluffs Iowa, it?EUR??,,????'???s a different story. The developer of Ridge View Estates will be able to install brick mailboxes on city right of way as he earlier requested of the Council Bluffs City Council. The council on Monday night gave its permission, listed in the official agreement as a license, to the developer – with some requirements. Under the agreement with the city, the brick mailbox structures will only be permitted on streets that have a speed limit of 25 mph or less. The maximum size of these structures shall not exceed 60 inches in height, 42 inches in width and 27 inches in depth, and the materials to be utilized must be standard bricks. Any variation as to materials would need approval by the Public Works Department. Concern was expressed about the height because it can affect visibility for any vehicle, even for a pickup. But it was agreed that the height can be changed at a later date if needed.

Obviously, there?EUR??,,????'???s a huge variation out there as to what you can or cannot do. Always check the local codes.

img
 




Effects of Mexican Cement Agreement?








The ?EUR??,,????'??antidumping duty?EUR??,,????'?? on Mexican cement that Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez announced on January 19, 2006 will likely be a two-stage effect, according to Ken Simonson, chief economist of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC).

Stage one: Around April 1, the U.S. will reduce the duty on Mexican cement to $3 per metric ton (Mt) from the current $26 and allow three million Mt of Mexican cement into the U.S. for each of the next three years. Mexico, for its part, must remove import and export barriers.

Stage two, to occur if both sides abide by the agreement for three years, would eliminate the duty and quotas altogether.

U.S. cement consumption exceeded 125 million Mt in 2005, a rise of 2.7 percent. U.S. cement production, however, was flat, necessitating imports of cement and clinker (which is ground into cement) by 18 percent, to a combined total of 31.8 million Mt. Canada was the leading foreign supplier, followed by China, Greece, Thailand, South Korea and Venezuela, with Mexico seventh.

Mexico will likely surpass in short order many of these supplying countries because of its lower delivery costs that reach the U.S. by rail or ship in a few days, compared to several weeks for ships crossing the Pacific or Atlantic. The lower duties should shorten supply lines to many markets and reduce the number or severity of cement shortages, however, the reduction in the duty may not lead to any slowdown in price increases. In 2005, the producer price index (PPI) for cement rose 11.7 percent. The PPI for concrete products went up 9.8 percent, led by an 11.6 percent rise in ready-mixed prices. If construction demand for concrete remains strong, it is unlikely an additional million tons of Mexican cement will cause the price to drop. However, once the duty and quotas are eliminated, Mexico could ship enough cement into the U.S. to force other countries to reduce their prices.

The AGC feels the ultimate solution to cement shortages is building more production capacity in the U.S. close to where demand is strongest.






Oregon Cement Firm to Increase Supply








Ash Grove Cement recently acquired a new import-terminal facility from Goldendale Aluminum in Portland, Ore. The new facility will allow Ash Grove Cement to increase its annual supply to the region by as much as 800,000 tons of cement.

The new facility is on the Willamette River and is adjacent to Ash Grove?EUR??,,????'???s current facility which has a storage capacity of 18,000 tons. Ash Grove?EUR??,,????'???s capacity will increase to 72,000 tons and will also increase its waterfront property to three-quarters of a mile.

?EUR??,,????'??The Northwest and Rocky Mountain areas have been a very hot market in the last few years,?EUR??,,????'?? said Dave Baker, vice president of sales for Ash Grove in Portland. ?EUR??,,????'??As a result, we saw an opportunity here to buy this other terminal where we can import and supplement our supply to better serve the market.?EUR??,,????'??

Ash Grove currently has five cement plants in the Northwest and has expanded two in the last five years. In addition, the company has also started construction on a plant in Las Vegas, but does not expect production to begin until 2009.






Price Fixing Lands Concrete Executives in Prison

A federal judge recently sentenced four current and former concrete company executives to prison for a price fixing scheme.

Prosecutors said that Irving executives conspired with other companies to fix the prices homeowners, building contractors and the government paid for ready-mix concrete in central Indiana.

According to prosecutors, from January 2000 until May 2004, executives from Irving Materials Inc. met with their competitors to set prices charged for concrete in the Indianapolis metropolitan area.

Irving Materials Inc., President Fred ?EUR??,,????'??Pete?EUR??,,????'?? Irving, vice presidents Price Irving and Daniel C. Butler, and retired executive vice president John Huggins were each sentenced to five months in prison and five months of probation on price fixing charges. No other companies were charged.

Source: Peru Tribune




img