Products, Vendors, CAD Files, Spec Sheets and More...
Sign up for LAWeekly newsletter
Round Rock, Texas Going Green
?EUR??,,????'?????<?The city is seeking to improve these rules to address changing development patterns, address water conservation and make the ordinances easier to follow.?EUR??,,????'?????<? - Round Rock, Texas Development Services 2011
The round rock for which this Southwestern town was named in 1854 can still be seen in Brushy Creek in the historic part of town north of Austin. This is the community in which outlaw cowboy and train robber Sam Bass met his end on his twenty-seventh birthday, July 21, 1878 to the blazing guns of the Texas Rangers.
Once a feeder route of the Chisholm Trail that sent cattle drives and cowboys north to Midwestern markets, this town is now home to Dell Computer and related high-tech industries. Towns like Round Rock with a high standard of community design, interesting character, quality schools and ample outdoor recreation activities tend to attract industry and development. They also tend to have good development codes.
Part of the quality of life found in this community is a result of their community landscape code, and their tree protection and preservation ordinance. Both are now being revised by the Development Services Division to address changes to local development, consolidate overlapping tree requirements and to simplify the documents. The city is also ?EUR??,,????'?????<?greening?EUR??,,????'?????<? their code to incorporate aspects of sustainable design.
Code Changes Round Rock is entirely scraping its landscape code. The biggest change is to partially convert it to a point-based code, i.e., compliance is measured in points rather than design intent, performance or prescribed outcome.
Many landscape architects feel point-based codes change the emphasis from design to quotas. City planners seek a means to quantify compliance. If a point system is used, it should apply to all aspects of the design. This code does not do that.
The point schedule measures compliance with points for various classes of plant material and site elements. Points have been added to promote sustainability, with such items as bike parking shade structures and plant materials. However, there is no measure for onsite stormwater management performance. To discourage the use of potable water, the schedule provides negative points for turf grass use.
The code also promotes water conservation, including the use of native plants, reduction in the use of grass within tree planting zones and trimming the 100 percent requirement for irrigation coverage. It also allows alternate means for irrigation as a water conservation strategy.
But perhaps the greatest greening stratagems in the code are to stimulate designers to find creative site planning methods to ?EUR??,,????'?????<?capture, filter, reuse and infiltrate stormwater.?EUR??,,????'?????<? Onsite stormwater management should be central to greening all landscape codes, and local stormwater codes should be updated to promote this idea. How to measure this is not clear. Perhaps the code could be linked to the Earth-Kind landscape program sponsored by Texas A&M Cooperative Extension or, even better, connected to the SITES program led by the ASLA, the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center (University of Texas, Austin) and the United States Botanic Garden.
Design Components Standard design components of this code pertain to a variety of zoning districts. Most landscape planting areas are eight feet wide. These include planting areas interior VUA landscaping, perimeter parking lot landscaping, screening, detention ponds, irrigation design and ?EUR??,,????'?????<?foundation treatment,?EUR??,,????'?????<? commonly called street wall planting areas. The purpose of this latter design component is to improve pedestrian access and views to architectural design features and signs. This new feature of the code must earn 200-400 FTPs (foundation treatment points), based upon categories of parking bays in front of buildings.
The draft includes an ?EUR??,,????'?????<?alternative design provision?EUR??,,????'?????<? that allows the designer to petition for a landscape plan equal to or better than what might be produced if one strictly adheres to the minimum requirements as set forth in the code.
Curiously, this requirement replaces the street-yard planting requirement of the current code, whose purpose was to improve the view from the public street, reduce views of street-side parking lots and improve roadway safety. This was the first constitutional landscape requirement under California law in 1949. This ruling was the first to allow communities to cross over the property line and place landscape requirements on private property.
Since this was the initially reason for the introduction of public landscape codes, one wonders why the 30 percent street yard landscaping is being eliminated. With the street yard gone, parking lots and buildings will be pushed closer to the public street.
As retired Texas Tech professor George Tereshkovich so aptly pointed out in his 1990 study of Texas tree and landscape ordinances, ?EUR??,,????'?????<?Texans are still keenly interested in plantings to enhance the aesthetics values of their properties and cities.?EUR??,,????'?????<? Based upon pending changes to the Round Rock code it seems they are becoming interested in landscape sustainability as well.
Francisco Uviña, University of New Mexico
Hardscape Oasis in Litchfield Park
Ash Nochian, Ph.D. Landscape Architect
November 12th, 2025
Sign up to receive Landscape Architect and Specifier News Magazine, LA Weekly and More...
Invalid Verification Code
Please enter the Verification Code below
You are now subcribed to LASN. You can also search and download CAD files and spec sheets from LADetails.