ADVERTISEMENT
LASN News November-December 198511-01-85 | News



lECA “Protects Our Future”

The International Erosion Control Association of Pinole, California, will be sponsoring “Conference XVII, Erosion Control, Protecting Our Future,” in Dallas, Texas, from February 27-28.

The conference will deal with the problems and practices of erosion control in the ‘80s and ‘90s. It will offer information on private industry and government projects, new technology, new material, new equipment, and the latest in research.

The IECA conference will be held in the Doubletree Hotel at Campbell Center off the Central Expressway in Dallas.



LA’s Judge CECA Awards

img
 




Dan Heiny





Tony Amatto


More than 180 entries are eligible for the California Landscape Contractors Association’s 30th Annual Trophy Awards Program. Judging the 26 different categories will be Dan Heiny, a landscape consultant with the SWA Group and Tony Amatto, a licensed landscape architect and contractor.

“Thirty Years of Excellence” is the theme for the CLCA’s convention to be held at Hyatt Lake Tahoe, Incline Village, Nevada on November 7-10. The trophy awards will be presented Friday, November 8.

Among other social and business events, a luncheon will be held on Saturday lead by motivational speaker Mark Victor, as well as a two-hour afternoon program. For more information, contact Sharon McGuire, CLCA Headquarters, (916) 448-CLCA.



Landscape Freezer

The California Transportation Commission announced on October 9, it is imposing a freeze on most new highway landscaping projects because of a multi-million dollar shortage in state highway construction funds.

The commission stated it proposes to take nearly $60 million in landscaping funds over the next five years and use the funds for highway safety improvements.

According to Commission Vice Chairman Joe Levy, “We have people dying every day on our roads because of highway (improvements) we can’t afford to build. I think we have to save peoples’ lives before we beautify.”

In Irvine, the commission held a special meeting and adopted its policy against funding any new highway landscaping projects, with the, exception of “minimum work” necessary to satisfy legal requirements and court orders. Although counties will be able to apply for exceptions to the freeze on landscaping, local officials must turn to other sources, such as private donations, if they desire any state money.

The current freeze will delay landscaping projects until 1990-91.

Orange and San Diego counties face the biggest cuts in proposed landscaping project funds, with cuts in project funding totaling $15.7 c million and $8.5 million, respectively.

“Because of the fiscal crisis we have right now a minimum shortfall of $650 million, the commission feels very strongly that we must place road projects that are safety related in nature above landscaping,” said Commission Chairman Bruce Nestande, an Orange County supervisor. “Is there anybody out there who’d rather have landscaping than roads?”

State transportation planners say they already are working to reduce freeway landscaping costs. Moving to more efficient planting techniques and holding down expensive irrigation projects, Caltrans, estimates it can landscape twice the acreage it could 10 years ago with the same amount of money.

“I think there is a continual testing of the public will in terms of the amount of landscaping,” said Caltrans Chief Deputy Director Heinz Heckeroth. “We have gone from nothing to outright beautification and back down again.”



Royce Unavailable

After making several attempts to contact State Senator Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, in an effort to clarify his stand on the so-called Landscape Architect License Repealer Act which he introduced and suddenly dropped, the Senator made no effort to make a comment.

Unfortunately his staff was unable to provide any information on the bill. The only information his staff was able to provide was the fact that Senator Royce was not in his office.

The Landscape Architect and Specifier News invites Senator Royce to answer the following questions: What was the purpose behind the introduction of the bill? Why was the bill dropped so suddenly? Are there any plans to introduce the same bill or a similar one in 1986? (Ed Royce was sent five separate copies of this issue.)



New Regs?

San Diego’s city council will be considering a proposal this month that would establish new citywide landscaping regulations. The proposal will set up detailed guidelines for all landscaping projects in the future, as well as any existing projects.

According to Bob Stover, long time industry professional and advisor to The Landscape Architect and Specifier News, San Diego’s proposal is a dangerous one, not for the contractors, but to other landscape professionals.

“What I see happening if that ordinance goes through is this Number one, the growers are going to suffer quite extensively when they are limited as to what they can grow,” said Stover. He pointed out that a new grower wouldn’t face any problems because his inventory would generally be smaller and he could simply grow the acceptable plants.

Stover noted the fact that an established grower with a large inventory won’t have it that easy. The grower may have millions of dollars invested in standard plant material and suddenly he has no market to sell his product.

“Number two,” according to Stover, “If the city is going to have a required plant pallet and it’s going to be supervising and controlling the installation, there will be no need for a landscape architect.” The city will simply ask where the property is located, show the contractor a list of acceptable plants, and hand the contractor a completed plot plan.

The Landscape Ordinance, originally introduced at the recommendation of the San Diego Planning Department because of expressed desire from the city council and public for “increased and improved landscaping,” will require the establishment of a Landscape Review Board that would approve all landscape plans and regularly inspect all sites to insure compliance of all new standards.

Once a landscaping plan is approved by the committee, its installation would be monitored by a Special Landscape Inspector. The inspector would be certified and hired by the city).

The proposal is broken down into three major categories:

– Landscaping, which would define appropriate designs and mandate the extent of required landscaping in relation to the various types and designs of development projects.

– Yard Definitions, which would show a number of diagrams that will indicate the portions and to what extent a project will require landscaping.

– Technical Supplement, which would list specific guidelines showing types of trees, shrubs, groundcovers, irrigation systems, soil, maintenance and installation standards, and an outline of inspection and enforcement procedures.

Included on the recommended list of plants are: Weeping Myal, Carrotwood, Indian-Laurel, Kaffir Plum, Jacaranda, Melaleuca, Olive, Pine Trees, Fern-Pine, Brazilian Pepper, Brisbane Box, Evergreen Elm, Palms, Bottlebrush, Natal-Plum, Rock Willow, Rose of Sharon, Pfitzer Juniper, Privet, Celestial Bamboo, Australian Firethorne, Hawthorne, Star Jasmine, Virurnum, and Xylosma.

Planting considerations such as drought tolerance, erosion control, fire resistance, slope, spread, spacing, growth rates, and flowering criteria will be covered by the ordinance. Special emphasis would be placed on soil preparation, soil types, testing and analysis, and soil gradinq.

Special Landscape Inspectors would be responsible to ensure proper landscape permits were obtained. They would also observe the installation of landscaping projects to make certain the project conforms to all new standards. The inspectors would also provide inspection reports to the city, report discrepancies to the city, submit final reports certifying conformance and perform follow-up checks after a project is completed.


img