ADVERTISEMENT
LASN January 2014 Commentary: Welcome to 2014!01-06-14 | 11
Welcome to 2014!

George Schmok, Publisher




You know, I have always liked the mission and especially the members of ASLA. These are landscape architects, suppliers and even students who are not only doing their own work, but are also doing the work of the profession by joining into the conversation and supporting the profession as it continues to grow.

That said, since mid-summer, LASN has been in the midst of its regular audit of licensed landscape architects across the nation. Although we still have a few months to go before our research is complete, it is obvious that since the recession began, more existing landscape architects have dropped their existing licenses than new landscape architects have earned new licenses. The net affect is at least a 15% drop, or somewhere around 3-4,000 fewer licensed landscape architects in 2013.

Granted, since 2009 the economy has been less than great and the construction industry has been especially hard hit. So it was always expected that as the industry shrunk, so would the profession and the number of licensees.

Now, I believe that quite a few of you have decided to hold off renewing your licenses until things come back around, and many of you working in offices with multiple licensees have picked and chosen who would keep which license, and in which state, to keep the firm compliant without overwhelming an already tenuous bottom line.

Not wanting to punish those who are already being punished by the economy, LASN has kept many ex-licensees in the circulation. In any event, it is our belief that as the economy regains its strength, the number of licensees will also rebound . . . Unless the ASLA decides to abandon the pursuit of licensure and reverts back to granting landscape architect status upon nonlicensed members.

img
 

While this may sound far-fetched, recent conversations with a spokesperson for ASLA have that underlying feeling. In those conversations, their number of licensed landscape architects appears to be based on a loose interpretation of whom licensed landscape architects actually are. In addition, they appear almost giddy that there were fewer RLAs, while never expressing any concern that the profession has lost thousands of licensees . . .

In fact, when discussing licensure, including the number of landscape architects who are members of ASLA, their spokesperson said . . .

"ASLA does not track the licensure of its members, and recipients in every reported business category, perhaps with the exception of 2,750 students, could be licensed."

ASLA doesn't track the licensure of its members?!?! That in itself is a scary statement coming from the main association serving licensed landscape architects!

And would a licensed landscape architect, after four years of college, a working apprenticeship and after having passed the test and paying the fees, really rather be called a landscape or garden designer? I guess it is possible, but not something that should be supported by the ASLA.

So welcome to 2014! Only time will tell if this year turns out better than 2013, but hopefully ASLA will reassert itself as a champion of practice act licensure, get back to influencing others to join the profession and refocus on informing the public and the development industry about the tremendous value a licensed landscape architect has to the publics health, safety and welfare.

And . . . If you are an ex-licensed landscape architect, 2014 looks like a great year to get back on board!

God Bless and have a great year!

George Schmok, Publisher










HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
img