Products, Vendors, CAD Files, Spec Sheets and More...
Sign up for LAWeekly newsletter
For 20 years, The International Dark-Sky Association has increased the awareness of light pollution and has sought ways to educate the populace as to its cause and remediation. Dark skies advocates writing about good lighting? How can this be? This is the commonly held misunderstanding, that those who seek dark skies view all lighting as bad. For the record, dark skies does not mean dark ground.
The IDA sees quality luminaire design and implementation as a critical part of putting a halt to, and inevitably reversing the scourge of light pollution. We often hear that designers appreciate the dark concept and want more information on how to implement these concepts into their work. Dark sky principles are quite straightforward; light when you need it, where you need it, and no more. Anything more than this is wrong for myriad reasons.
For most landscape lighting, where accent and aesthetics are the principle concerns, the operative word is subtle. Let the eye see the detail and never the source. Contrary to popular misconceptions, there is no need to eliminate lighting. Excellent landscape lighting in general tends to demonstrate the concepts that ambiance, comfort, security and safety are enhanced. Excellent lighting design is one of the great intangibles; good lighting is felt but can’t be touched. You know it when you see it; you feel it when you are in it. It can also be ruined by poorly designed luminaires and poor design practices.
Lighting for dark sky principles includes control, by luminaire selection, lamp wattage, commissioning, and future inspection. That’s not how we do things now, but some things need to change, and inspection and validations should be considered part of the design scheme.
One of the fundamental methods of controlling light pollution is the simple curfew. In many cases, this dark sky friendly tactic can be implemented immediately. Utilizing simple timers can also make retrofitting existing installations feasible, practical and economical. The darkened exterior of a building, form of a statue, or fronds of a palm tree aren’t an issue of safety.
The goal for the landscape architect is to create ambience. If lighting is ever an afterthought, or delegated to an entity not concerned with the aforementioned ambience, disaster looms. Bright light haphazardly aimed can feel like an interrogation, or perhaps prison yard lighting.
“ Excellent lighting design is one of the great intangibles; good lighting is felt but can’t be touched. You know it when you see it; you feel it when you are in it.”—–Peter Strasser
Be aware of luminaire height and tree growth. Well meaning environmental awareness can backfire. Planting trees to mitigate the urban heat island effect, particularly in parking lots, is a worthy and rational practice. However, conflict often arises when allotting space for said trees and the inevitable (and expected) desirable growth of the trees occurs. Will the illumination of these area lights be impacted by the growth of carbon absorbing, shadow-casting, ambience improving trees? Forethought and cooperation between governing bodies is essential for both daytime shade and nighttime visibility to coexist.
Avoid criminal friendly lighting. A jerk-kneed response to “correcting” a lighting problem is to throw more light on the subject, the more the better. This is most often seen around ATM machines, where liability is in question. The lighting selected can be situated such that the area is sufficiently lit, without harsh glare or shadows, while making the transition from the lighted space to the outer area even and not abrupt. It can be done. However, owing to the excessive lighting practices, all in the name of theoretical litigation, most patrons of ATM machines feel not only well illuminated, but exposed and vulnerable. How, and why this is considered a safe environment? The ubiquitous wall pack, with cheap initial cost and non existent glare control, remains the industry standard for most ATM lighting and area lighting in general, with their deep shadows, harsh illuminance levels, and mounting heights virtually guaranteeing discomfort and disabling glare.
Presently, the most common question posed about dark sky lighting is how to incorporate “nostalgia” luminaires into designs where the streetscape is included. These nostalgia luminaires are often referred to as “acorns” because of the resemblance the glass portion has to the seeds of some oak trees. For most dark sky advocates these acorns a truly “nuts.”
Nostalgia luminaires are sought after and installed for their appearance in daytime. Contemporary lamp wattages routinely provided with them are so high that one cannot begin to contemplate the beauty of the design, let alone look anywhere near them because of the intense, uncomfortable glare they produce.
The public needs a little history lesson here. This Old World post top design had an Old World lumen output, in that they contained a flame. That is why the Victorian lexicon has the term “Lamplighter” and not “high intensity discharge lamp.”
The light given off by these flame-driven luminaires was sufficient for the task at hand. In the present conformations, the pole height is similar, the optics are similar (if one allows for acrylics as well as glass), but the light source and the expected tasks are astonishingly different.
They are typically lamped with sources exceeding 10,000 lumens, at the same height as the old world, flame-containing luminaire. They are also expected to light up the roadway, public areas and the surrounding environs. When lamped with an HID source, people are exposed to harsh glare and discomfort.
An acorn luminaire should not be considered for illuminating a roadway. They are simply the wrong mounting height for illuminating a street and without being a source of disabling glare. Another flaw in the design is the lack of light control. Light is thrown in every direction.
What can be a solution to the problem is selecting the best light control design available, lamp them with lower lumen output, certainly below 1,000 lumens, and light the roadway only at conflict points/intersections with a conventional full cut off streetlight.
Regardless of the quality of the installation and a majority opinion that the lighting level is good, there will always be those who feel that an installation it is too dark or insecure. Habituation to “seeing the source” as proper and necessary for “good lighting” is commonplace.
A new concept for encouraging better lighting practices has been in place for several years, the LEED building certification program. Regrettably this program remains cursory when it comes to discouraging poor lighting design. While LEED has the Sustainable Sights Credit #8, The Light Pollution Reduction Credit, it remains an option. From the public’s viewpoint, it can make a LEED certified building a laughingstock and put a black eye on the LEED certification program. A LEED certified building can have the most egregious examples of bad lighting design, wasting energy while shining any amount of light in all directions, with no thought of containment, curfew or control. Lighting systems reserved for stadium lighting could be blasted on a building and it will still achieve LEED certification. Until Credit #8 becomes a requirement, light pollution can be a problem on even the most presumably energy efficient structures.
Wasteful lighting destroys and disrupts the livability found in otherwise well designed spaces, and then extends beyond the living space to obscure the firmament, the space of the starry heavens. Why has this ever been considered an acceptable practice, let alone condoned? Waste is never good, with the single exception that its very nature will lead to its demise. As energy resources become scarcer and increasingly expensive, our society can no longer behave with the ill conceived notion of having the luxury and right to waste.
The Dark Sky cause has a powerful, professional ally in the effort to curtail and reverse light pollution. Such can be achieved with a well thought out lighting scheme, eliminating light trespass and having no contribution to light pollution. Good lighting practices will reverse the trend of over lighting, and as that happens, the beauty of the night’s celestial sphere will once again be visible to everyone, everywhere.
There are scores of luminaires that have been given IDA’s Fixture Seal of Approval and are certified as dark sky friendly. Don’t be fooled by imitations. See their website at www.darksky.org for details about these products.
To submit a fixture or apply to the Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) Program, please download the FSA Application at www.darksky.org (Adobe Reader Required). You may also call 1 (520) 293-3198.
Francisco Uviña, University of New Mexico
Hardscape Oasis in Litchfield Park
Ash Nochian, Ph.D. Landscape Architect
November 12th, 2025
Sign up to receive Landscape Architect and Specifier News Magazine, LA Weekly and More...
Invalid Verification Code
Please enter the Verification Code below
You are now subcribed to LASN. You can also search and download CAD files and spec sheets from LADetails.