Products, Vendors, CAD Files, Spec Sheets and More...
Sign up for LAWeekly newsletter
Patricia Johanson’s design for Fair Park Lagoon in Dallas, Texas recreated a freshwater swamp in the middle of the city’s largest park. Previously known as Dallas’s “old mud hole,” the project was designed as a functional flood basin as well as home to plants, animals, including snails, clams, freshwater sponges and shrimp, fish, reptiles, waterfowl, birds and insects: all “decorative” members of the food chain. Landscaping was conceived of as “food.”
“The artist is the one who gives form, but it’s not just about the optimal form. More importantly, it’s about creating something that works.” Patricia Johanson was hired to give form to Fair Park Lagoon, however she felt the design had to be about life not about art. She had no background as a landscape architect or as a landscape designer, but she started naturally designing landscapes. “You really have to understand what each aspect and part of the site wants. There doesn’t need to be a concept of nature, necessarily. The idea, instead, is not just designing for visual effect, you want to design for the animals and what eats those animals,” says Johanson, and it carries through to all the wastewater projects she does. “When you get down to this tiny level, once you understand the life cycle, that’s what keeps things in check. It is the golden mean. The harmony of the golden mean isn’t just a visual harmony, it’s a living harmony.”
“For years I had tried to put my ideas forward by building my own projects, exhibiting drawings in art galleries and museums, and lecturing at universities. Multi-million dollar commissions usually don’t appear out of nowhere, yet Fair Park Lagoon illustrates both the complexity and the casual beginnings of many public art projects. In 1981, when I was first asked to redesign the lagoon, there was neither money nor community interest. Harry Parker, then Director of the Dallas Museum of Art, had seen my “Plant Drawings” in a New York art gallery. He reasoned that if I could produce a new design for the lagoon, the Dallas Museum could exhibit the drawings and raise the money. There was no program and no budget. He just said, “Do what you think needs to be done.”
“On my first visit to Dallas it was clear that the lagoon was environmentally degraded. The shoreline was eroding, and the water was murky. The Parks Department had been fertilizing the lawn, and every time it rained fertilizer would wash into the lagoon, causing algal bloom. A green slime covered the water. There was no food chain; there were hardly any plants, animals, or fish. Basically the lagoon was dead.
“People had no experience of the water, except that a number of children had fallen in and drowned. The lagoon had become a danger and an obstruction. A five-block body of water surrounded by museums, people had to walk all the way around it to get from one side to the other.
Instead of the imposed vision of the artist, the lagoon allows for the development of a multitude of subjective situations.
“I began to develop my own list of concerns, which included creating a functioning ecosystem for a wide variety of plants and animals. I also wanted to control bank erosion, and create paths so that people could cut across the lagoon. I began to do research on what different animals eat, because I knew that the right plants would attract wildlife. The project evolved from many different perspectives at once. I knew that the structures had to not only solve a host of environmental problems, but also had to be acceptable to scientists, engineers and city planners.
“Eventually I chose two native Texas plants as models for the sculpture. The Delta Duck-Potato (Sagittaria platyphylla) had a mass of twisted roots that I arranged to prevent water from eroding the shoreline, while spaces between the roots became microhabitats for plants, fish, turtles and birds. The roots were built as five-foot wide paths that people could walk out on, while thinner stems rose out of the water and became perches for birds. Leaves further out in the lagoon became islands where animals could rest. Other leaves along the shore became step-seating and overlooks.
“The second sculpture at the opposite end of the lagoon was based on a Texas fern (Pteris multifida). The fern functions as a bridge — not a direct pathway over the water, but a network of crossovers, islands and stopping points. Individual leaflets are twisted to create the kinds of spaces I wanted, and the tip of the fern is a causeway surrounded by water lilies and irises. At one point I approached the staff of the Dallas Museum of Natural History with the idea of creating “living exhibits” in the lagoon itself, rather than having everything segregated in little glass cases. They were enthusiastic about the idea, and we began to work together.
“A letter from Walter R. Davis, Assistant Director of the Dallas Museum of Natural History, described the process. He wrote, ‘The weeks following your arrival were exciting for the scientific staff of the museum. There were lengthy discussions of the water quality of the Lagoon and the missing links in its deteriorating food chain. The environmental needs of turtles, fish, birds, and a host of native aquatic plants were outlined. Years of field work in Texas now paid off, as lists were compiled of the localities where native aquatic plants could be collected and transplanted into the refurbished lagoon.
“‘The lagoon was planted with emergent vegetation that roots in shallow water and further out with floating plants. Along the shore we planted bulrushes and wild rice — tall grasses that provide shelter and food for small animals and birds. Just before the project was dedicated, flocks of wild birds arrived. Different species of fish were introduced into an environment that could nurture them.
“Walter Davis continued, ‘Today the Lagoon teems with life. Those who understand the intricacies of a functioning ecosystem find particular satisfaction here. A kingfisher visiting for the first time in decades, signals that the water is clear enough for this master fisherman to spot minnows swimming beneath the surface. A pair of least bitterns, secretive inhabitants of the vegetative shoreline, moved in the first year and has built a nest and raised a family each of the past five years. Ducks and turtles sun themselves on emergent parts of the sculpture, safe from predatory dogs and cats and enthusiastic children. These plants and animals are not captives held for the enjoyment of human spectators. Most have chosen to live in the Lagoon because it provides food and shelter for themselves and their offspring.”’
“Each project is different and there is always more to learn. Basically, the fast way to learn is go out to a similar site and then observe and talk to locals and see the larger cycles of what happens from year to year. It’s about seeing what’s there, because what is possible is already in place, ready to come back. You can’t restore something that was never there. All the mitigation people made this mistake. They promise a landscape similar to one in the general vicinity even if there wasn’t one already there. Restoration is simple. If it used to be a wetland and is now a parking lot—just pull up the asphalt. The wetland is already there. It will come back. You can’t invent this stuff. You need to do the research—historical research as well as intensive research on that particular piece of land.
“I do what ever project I’m asked to do that interests me,” says Johanson. “I’m interested in solving problems and you need to work with each particular piece of land.” She’s primarily interested in public lands, parks that are free to everyone. Although she grew up in Olmsted’s Parks, she didn’t realize people had constructed them or the amount of effort and design that went into designing “wild places.”
“Creating a nurturing, living world doesn’t mean it can’t be a popular and entertaining place. People love Fair Park Lagoon. Children play alongside the insects, reptiles, birds and mammals that live there. Fair Park Lagoon is really a swamp — a raw functioning ecology that people are normally afraid of. The art project affords people access to this environment, so they find out how wonderful a swamp really is. It’s popular, not because people are overwhelmed by my sculpture. They’re discovering a marvelous new world.
It is a many layered design that responds to “real” needs—aesthetic, ecological and functional and becomes an inclusive, life-supporting, open-ended framework that allows for dialogue between art, man and nature.”
By Patricia Johanson
Gardens are choreographed with paths that establish a pattern of movement through space much like dance notation. While others have described my sculptures as “paths” with the implication that an “ideal’ series of tableaux or experiences will unfold in time and space, this is not the case. What attracts me are complex landscapes that have a life of their own.
Their designed structures are meant to lure visitors, frame the flow of nature and bring them into contact with the profuse phenomena of the natural world. The most important aspects of my landscapes, and the key to their success lie in the parts I do not design. Photographs focus on objects, but the real content of a landscape is everything nature has to offer. I want visitors to consider the minutiae of nature as well as the grand sweep of the intricate network of living relationships, which includes themselves.
Patricia Johanson grew up in New York City and the Long island suburbs, although Olmsted parks and summers in the Catskill Mountains remain her most indelible memory. In 1958 she entered Bennington College in Vermont to study art and music. During this period she met and became friends with Helen Frankenthaler who introduced her to many of the art world luminaries of the day. She then got her masters degree at Hunter College in Art History, Johanson continued to design large outdoor sculptures while assembling credentials in engineering and architecture. She entered the Architecture Program at City College of New York, while working for Mitchell-Giurgola, the well known architectural firm. In 1976, she worked with and became great friends of Georgia O’Keefe. They began a lifelong friendship that still inspires Johanson. Patricia Johanson’s House and Garden Commission” by Xin Wu has just been released by Harvard University Press.
Francisco Uviña, University of New Mexico
Hardscape Oasis in Litchfield Park
Ash Nochian, Ph.D. Landscape Architect
November 12th, 2025
Sign up to receive Landscape Architect and Specifier News Magazine, LA Weekly and More...
Invalid Verification Code
Please enter the Verification Code below
You are now subcribed to LASN. You can also search and download CAD files and spec sheets from LADetails.